🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a draft bill that include decreasing the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, WHO officials issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be lowered to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the law is enacted.

International experts actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass 65% of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavored tobacco discussion

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We live in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with current country statutes. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, adding that young individuals should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to accomplish desired population health targets, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which includes increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.